No Reservations.
The lead character Kate, a master chef who works at upscale 22 Bleecker Restaurant in Manhattan, has her heart set out on only focusing her attention and time on her culinary concoctions. She focuses too much on her profession and her kitchen that she becomes so uptight and intimidates everyone around her. She's so much of a perfectionist that she focuses so much on the little details on her platting and is easily offended by side comments on her food.Her perfectionist ways are tested with the arrival of two new
occurrences. First, she was left to be the guardian of her sister's daughter, Zoe. Her sister and nine-year-old niece were in an accident in which her sister didn't survive. Zoe was left speechless and Kate found it hard to get through to her. Second was the appearance of her brand new sous-chef Nick. He also very talented and high-spirited by nature. Kate felt threatened by him and feared that he was going to take her kitchen, her life away from her.
As weeks progressed, she discovered that the high-spirited Nick could be the bridge she needed to reach out to Zoe. She also realized she might be trying things that she normally doesn't do and that includes opening up to other people; allowing them to get close to her, including Nick. She also found out that she's been focused so much on the little details that she locks people out. She was about to loose Nick. With help of her niece, She decided to make a choice. She quit her job and stopped Nick from going to San Francisco. They opened a new restaurant of their own, Hers, Nick's and of coarse Zoe's.^^
Don't limit your life to what you already have, there are other things that are more important. Learn to be open and express your self freely in front of other people.
Labels: assignment, englone, summary, theme analysis



I've been going to school for the past 14 to 13 years now so I pretty much have an idea on how I could or can classify the teachers that I had and those that I have now. Normally students would classify their teachers depending on the subject that they teach or the level of difficulty of the subject. However, I guess I could classify them now depending on how they teach, whether they are objective, subjective, or their somewhere in the middle. Subjective teachers are those who do not really go by the book. They use their own style in teaching. They prefer group discussions to long, sometimes boring, lectures. They would rather choose research papers over test papers. They choose to test how the student understand or interprets the lecture instead of drilling them with exams or quizzes. Maybe teachers who teach religion, music, arts, psychology, philosophy and other subject that focus on theories and the like fall under this category.(intrcom?^^)
When it comes to LOVE, what's more important? 
